Steel engraving preservation- 1863 Longstreet's Repulse

Get help and framing advice from the framing community
Post Reply
ewvoigt
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed 07 Jan, 2009 1:23 am
Location: Michiga USA
Organisation: Amateur
Interests: Framing

Steel engraving preservation- 1863 Longstreet's Repulse

Post by ewvoigt »

My concern is conserving a recent acquisition of a steel engraving. Apparently it has been framed against glass without matting for many years; it may be an original. The frame appears to be original and I don't want to replace it. The glass does not appear to be original because it is clear without bubbles.

The easiest would be to leave it against the glass, as is, without a mat and with core board backing [there was a wood slat board backing]. However, I am concerned about it adhering to the glass which it has not for maybe 100+ years.

The frame is 29 1/2" by 19" with a 5/6" rabbet. There is no room to mat the image because the description is close the bottom edge.
Attachments
Longstreets_Repulse.jpg
Longstreets_Repulse.jpg (72.52 KiB) Viewed 1205 times
Not your average framer
Posts: 11013
Joined: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Devon, U.K.
Organisation: The Dartmoor Gallery
Interests: Lost causes, saving and restoring old things, learning something every day
Location: Glorious Devon

Re: Steel engraving preservation- 1863 Longstreet's Repulse

Post by Not your average framer »

I used to own a secondhand bookshop and antique prints business, so I guess I ought be the one to answer this one. Keeping the print in the original frame seems sensible enough, but you are taking a bit of a chance framing this print in direct contact with the glass and I don't think that covering over the description is necessarily a bad thing to do if a copy of the description can be stuck to the back of the frame, or assuming that the available space around the image is adequate to include a text window below the image.

If you decide to go for fitting a mount with a text window, then a double mount would make it possible to have a text window in the front mount with the mount behind this separating the added text from the print as a wise precaution. BTW, I am assuming that an old engraving like this will also have a plate mark pressed into the print paper arould the printed image and would point out that it is normal to allow an adequate size of aperture to show both the image and the plate mark. This is normal practice to do this as the plate mark is a feature which demonstrates that this is an original as opposed to a modern reproduction print.
Mark Lacey

“Life is short. Art long. Opportunity is fleeting. Experience treacherous. Judgement difficult.”
― Geoffrey Chaucer
vintage frames
Posts: 1349
Joined: Tue 12 Jun, 2012 6:05 pm
Location: West Wales
Organisation: https://www.dermotmcardle.co.uk/
Interests: Making picture frames
Contact:

Re: Steel engraving preservation- 1863 Longstreet's Repulse

Post by vintage frames »

If you want to conserve the print and put it back into it's original frame, then my advice is to first float mount it onto some museum board. Then place some paper wrapped spacer fillets into the rebate so that there is a 1/4" spacing between the print and the glass. You say the rebate is 5/6" wide, so there should be lots of room for the spacer fillets. I'm assuming the print was "close framed" before so there really wouldn't be any room to include a mount without masking the plate mark,just as NYAF advised against.
Affordable Gilding Course for Professional Framers-https://www.dermotmcardle.co.uk/
https://www.instagram.com/dermotmcardle/
Post Reply