light weight hand made paper distortion
Posted: Sat 13 Apr, 2013 6:47 am
I am having a real problem, with re-mounting, a largish, limited edition mono print, on light weight, hand made organic paper.
It was brought in last year with the print having moved and on taking it apart, found that the print had been attached to the undermount, by a continuous strip of
self adhesive crepe tape. The glue had partially failed, allowing the print to move.
I then re-attached the print, using conservation quality undermount and two "T" hinges and it looked fine.
Some months later when the customer was visiting the gallery again, she mentioned in passing that the print had started to wave and cockle.
I asked where it was hung and she said in the Kitchen. I advised that this was not an appropriate location and suggested that she move it to a warmer, drier location, in the hope that it might flatten, which she did.
Cockling still evident, so she returned it to me to correct.
I carefully removed the two archival "T",s and fitted a continuous hinge of Hayaku gummed hinging tape across the top. In view of my previous experience, I decided to wait and see if there was any further movement, before re-assembling everything. Just as well that I did, Signs of the dreaded cockling once again.
The one thing that both of these methods have in common, is the application of something wet, or damp to the paper. It is almost as if the paper has a one way memory or reaction to moisture
The customer states that she has owned the print for many years, attached via the brown crepe tape method, with no movement.
I have looked at other alternatives and was wondering if archival corners, loosely fitted to allow movement, might help.
Have any other forum members experienced anything similar. This is a really nice print and I want to return it flat and in good order, so really interested to hear of other peoples method of overcoming this type of problem
Colin
It was brought in last year with the print having moved and on taking it apart, found that the print had been attached to the undermount, by a continuous strip of
self adhesive crepe tape. The glue had partially failed, allowing the print to move.
I then re-attached the print, using conservation quality undermount and two "T" hinges and it looked fine.
Some months later when the customer was visiting the gallery again, she mentioned in passing that the print had started to wave and cockle.
I asked where it was hung and she said in the Kitchen. I advised that this was not an appropriate location and suggested that she move it to a warmer, drier location, in the hope that it might flatten, which she did.
Cockling still evident, so she returned it to me to correct.
I carefully removed the two archival "T",s and fitted a continuous hinge of Hayaku gummed hinging tape across the top. In view of my previous experience, I decided to wait and see if there was any further movement, before re-assembling everything. Just as well that I did, Signs of the dreaded cockling once again.
The one thing that both of these methods have in common, is the application of something wet, or damp to the paper. It is almost as if the paper has a one way memory or reaction to moisture
The customer states that she has owned the print for many years, attached via the brown crepe tape method, with no movement.
I have looked at other alternatives and was wondering if archival corners, loosely fitted to allow movement, might help.
Have any other forum members experienced anything similar. This is a really nice print and I want to return it flat and in good order, so really interested to hear of other peoples method of overcoming this type of problem
Colin